Two Sides of a Coin: FDI and Nigeria’s Service-Led Structural Transformation
By the 2014
rebasing of its GDP, Nigeria became Africa’s largest economy trumping its long
time contender, South Africa. Amongst several things, the significant growth implies changes in the sectoral contribution of domestic output and employment.
Conventionally, for
a developing country context it is expected that international trade, foreign
direct investment, industrial policy and global price fluctuations would have
contributed to the shifts in the distribution of factors of production and
final output.
Given the uninclusive nature of the impressive surge
in output, it is important to investigate what sectors accounted for the
structural change. Using historical data on the Nigerian economy, Oyebanke
and I examined (in a forthcoming paper) the contribution of foreign direct investment to
structural transformation.
Specifically, in
the paper
we provided answers to the following questions: What are the sources, nature
and characteristics of the structural changes that have occurred in Nigeria’s
sectors over the past three decades? What sort of domestic and export policy
changes are required to speed the process of structural change? What is the
role of the State and its policies in this transformation? What institutional
mechanisms exist or need to be put in place to ensure that FDI leads to
equitable outcomes in Nigeria?
We found that,
while the percentage of those employed in the industrial and agricultural
sectors have been reducing in more recent years, the service sector has been
employing more people. In addition, labour productivity growth attributable to
a structural change has increased in recent years in the service sector, and
surpassed that due to within sector changes from 2005 to 2009.
Furthermore, the
industrial sector was observed to have received the greatest percentage of FDI
over the years, but has been declining in recent decade while that to the
service sector has been increasing. Notably, FDI to the agricultural sector has
been miniature. Thus, we conclude that FDI to Nigeria has been contributing to a
service-sector led structural transformation.
The findings of the
study provide several implications for national socio-economic and industrial
policies. For instance, we recommend a strategic infrastructure development
programme, which will create a conducive environment for and stimulate
large-scale domestic and foreign agricultural and manufacturing investments.
Towards generating
inclusive structural transformation, we advocate policy support to
protect and promote smallholder agriculture and small-scale industry
engagements.
The discussion
continues...
Comments
:the emergence of the brics economy especially China and India who shifted foreign investment to Nigeria to take advantage of of the under utilized materials and cheap labour with maximum potentials.
:the advent of Globalization which induces cross border transaction.
:the ability of the Nigerians to become innovative as result of limited job opportunities, this has geared domestic income.
:...and others factors IT, technological improvements, improved training and education.