Are African Countries Learning At All?

Developing countries, usually considered ‘latecomers’ in development, can create learning opportunities for themselves through channels of knowledge diffusion and technology transfer such as international trade and foreign direct investment. 

For instance, ownership-specific advantages of multinational corporations, which make up the majority of large corporations in developing countries, could spill over to the domestic environment through consciously built learning relationships (in forms of forward and backward linkages). Mauritius is an African success story of structural transformation resulting from export-oriented FDI stimulated through the creation of special economic zones.


Now that foreign investment promotion has become central to the industrial policies of most African economies, it is important to evaluate how much of the positive trends in FDI inflows are associated with local learning and improvements in local ways of doing things. Put differently, is FDI to Africa delivering on its ‘promise’ to promote local learning relationships?

Also, against the backdrop of the recently adopted sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the dire need for manufacturing-driven structural transformation in Africa, it is imperative to examine what role existing foreign capital plays in stimulating learning and enhancing domestic capacity.

In a recent paper, we provide a narrative on the role of FDI in promoting collaborative learning in an African context. Based on the assumption that firm-to-firm learning is not automatic, we examine how absorptive capacity impacts on firm-level learning and productivity in manufacturing – a crucial engine of growth and industrial development.

We conceptualize a learning economy as one in which the ability to attain new competencies is essential for the performance of firms, regions, countries and economic success of individuals. This requires an exploitation of the science, technology and innovation (STI) as well as the learning by doing, using and interacting (DUI) modes of learning.

For instance, the learning experience of China and Taiwan demonstrates how developing countries can catch-up, leapfrog and build domestic capacity by combining the DUI mode of learning with international trade and foreign direct investment.

Juxtaposing findings from a firm-level survey of Nigerian manufacturing firms with those from other firm-level studies within African contexts, we find that linkages between host country firms and foreign firms are necessary for effective technological learning to transpire and for firms to take on productive approaches.  

Although African development policy claims the existence of frameworks for collaborative learning between foreign-owned and local firms, this is far from realities on the ground.

Overall, the paper argues that building domestic absorptive capacity is central to creating a local learning economy in Africa. It also recognizes the need for more firm-level studies on the effects of MNCs’ presence on learning and capacity building in African environments.

Moving ahead, African governments should prioritize the creation of learning effects from FDI with the same tenacity with which they drive investment promotion.


The discussion continues…

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adverse Import: Cotonou Pineapple Vs Nigerian Pineapple

A New Dawn: SDGs, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Opinion Survey on Nigeria’s 2015 Presidential Elections: Preliminary Results

The Difference is Clear: Nigerian Police Barracks Versus Military/Naval/Air Force Barracks